For those who think Democracy should be
a collaborative experience.
February 8, 2008
What not to say ~ “How does it feel to have abandoned the cause of your life?”
A cable news show host opened his interview with a feminist political commentator who had just endorsed Obama with the question:
- How does it feel to have abandoned the cause of your life?
This remark is riddled with logical fallacies.
1) Absolute language / false dichotomy: It speaks of causes in black and white terms. Even if supporting a male candidate over a female one was a deviation for a feminist, that wouldn’t qualify as “abandoning the cause of your life.”
2) Reductive: It summarizes a complex situation simplistically.
3) Ad hominen attack: It attacks the person instead of the person’s position.
4) Assumption treated as fact.
Watch for fallacies in your own political conversations. Any time someone makes a claim or asks a question based on an assumption that is unwarranted, address the assumption instead of responding to the point made based on the fallacy.
You can read more about fallacies, here.
The woman who this comment targeted said: “Hardballs are just part of the game — and I am happy to stand in the batter’s box and take any of them on. But spitballs aren’t part of the game.”
It’s not part of the game for you either.
Email This Post
Related posts which may interest you
- Get real ~ You can wish your candidate had more experience AND still support him or her
- Old school politics ~ I’m voting for Hillary because I’m a woman
- Blog guidelines: How to start a reasonable dialogue about reasonable dialogue
- Guest post ~ here to serve…a growing sense of order
- What’s wrong with this picture?: Huge profit opportunities
No Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
| TrackBack URI
You can also bookmark
this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos
Blog Guidelines
By posting comments on Unite and Concur you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:
(1) If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient. This is a moderated blog. If you’ve ever read posts on unmoderated sites that touch on political issues, you know why this one is moderated one.
(2) I reserve the right to edit posted comments for content, clarity, and length.
(3) I also reserve the right to delete posts that do not follow UC guidelines. (If you call me an “ass,” I’m likely to delete your comment. If you correct or reinterpret a remark I made, I’m likely to approve your comment.) Be clear, be direct and have an opinion, but be nice. I will not approve abusive, offensive, profane, or racist posts – unless I do so to point out the inappropriateness of the remark. This is a reasonable dialogue about reasonable dialogue.
(4) When you post an opinion, provide your logic and sources.
(5) Be willing to allow others to influence your opinion.
(6) Avoid loaded language like: “Wing nut” and “fascist” unless they are the necessary to the content of your post.
Disclaimer:
– Reading and posting comments at Unite and Concur constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy.
– This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.
– We aim for accuracy. We’re not perfect. We’ll correct errors that are gracefully pointed out – and ones that are pointed out gracelessly too. We’ll just feel better while we correct the graceful ones.
Unite and Concur Pressroom